Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 00:47

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Is AI secretly replacing your job right now without you knowing it? What do you think? Do you agree?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What should you answer when someone says to you in French, "au plaisir de vous revoir"?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
New study maps psychological pathway from childhood abuse to adolescent addiction - PsyPost
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Race and genetics do not line up well, new study confirms - Live Science
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What story do you have involving a public restroom?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Several people killed in school shooting in Austria's second biggest city, police say - NBC News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Robinhood Traders Playing S&P Index-Guessing Game Get Schooled - Bloomberg